Legal Opinion

Delgado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 2015No. 5D15-1710PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, J., Raymond Delgado petitions for a writ of habeas corpus based on one claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Specifically, he argues appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise on direct appeal that his judgment and sentences for two counts of robbery and two counts of assault constitute double jeopardy. We grant the writ in part.

Delgado was originally charged in a five-count information with the following offenses: robbery with a firearm (counts one and three); aggravated assault with a firearm (counts two and four); and possession of drug paraphernalia…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Pope v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Novaton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Johnson v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jahman Whitfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Nehemiah William Ford v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Termitus v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API