Pitt v. State

Concurring opinion by

KRAUSE R, J.

I reluctantly concur. I concur because I believe that the conclusion reached by the majority is consistent with current *471case law. I do so reluctantly because I believe that the rule applied by the majority to reach that conclusion should be reconsidered. I am referring of course to the rule that when the State rescinds or otherwise terminates a plea agreement, for any reason, any inculpatory statement procured by that agreement is inadmissible. In fact, I write this concurrence in the hope that the Court of Appeals will revisit this rule and discard or at…