Legal Opinion

Neches Canal Co. v. Dishman

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 1085—5312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

While the defendants in error, to their answer filed to the plaintiffs in error’s application for the writ of error, do not concede the facts to be as stated in the application for the writ of error, we have concluded that the following statement made in the application *956is substantially correct, at least sufficiently so, to discuss tbe points of law involved.

“This suit was brought in the District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, by the Neehes Canal Company for a temporary and permanent injunction restraining the Dish-mans from destroying the banks of the North Amelia Lateral, a canal owned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ZuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. T. & St. Louis E. E. Co. v. JarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. v. HerringTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Hutcheson v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Fort Worth & New Orleans Railway Co. v. SweattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Besteiro v. BesteiroTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Carleton v. DierksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. City of Austin v. PuettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API