Legal Opinion

Arceneaux v. Cormier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1932No. 30864Published

1Opinion

On Second Rehearing.

ROGERS, J.

A further consideration of this case has confirmed the correctness of the view expressed in our original opinion that the title of the defendants A. J. and J. O. Cormier to the property in dispute is protected against plaintiffs’ attack by the prescription of five years provided by article 3543 of the Civil Code. This prescription applies to the informality arising from the sale of the property for its full value although for less than two-thirds of its appraised value, as well as to all informalities existing prior to the order of sale, which was issued by a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thibodeaux v. ThibodeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Samuels v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. Munholland v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  4. Louaillier v. CastilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  5. Killeen v. Boland, Gschwind Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API