Sabotta v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Trempealecm County, Action on a fire-insurance policy. The case is thus stalled by Mr. Justice Cassoday: The plaintiff’s application for the policy upon which this suit is brought, contained the following questions and answers: “ Question 14. What title has applicant to these premises? Answer. Fee-simple title. Q. 15. How many acres of land do you own? A. One hundred and twenty acres. Q. IT.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Trempealecm County, Action on a fire-insurance policy. The case is thus stalled by Mr. Justice Cassoday: The plaintiff’s application for the policy upon which this suit is brought, contained the following questions and answers: “ Question 14. What title has applicant to these premises? Answer. Fee-simple title. Q. 15. How many acres of land do you own? A. One hundred and twenty acres. Q. IT. Is your property incumbered? By and to what amount? A. Tes; $400.” It also contained a covenant and agreement that all the foregoing written answers to the several…
1Opinion
The respondent moved for a rehearing, and obtained an order on the appellant to show cause why the record should not be remitted to the circuit court for the purpose of having the bill of exceptions corrected. The following opinion was filed May 10, 1882:
2Per curiam
This is an order to show cause why the record should not be remitted to the court below for the purpose of having the bill of exceptions corrected in certain respects. The cause has been argued; submitted, and decided. The object of remitting the record is to have, stricken from the bill an exception which appears to have been taken by the…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Allerding v. CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861