Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Chavarria
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 2009No. 28,072, 28,073PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Chief Judge.
{1} Plaintiff Robert Gomez appeals from two judgments dismissing his claims with prejudice in two separate actions against Defendant Gary Chavarria. The district court in each action determined that Plaintiffs claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, NMSA 1978, § 37-1-8 (1976), and that the one-year extension granted to minors in NMSA 1978, Section 37-1-10 (1975) did not save the actions. The issues are the same in both actions. Plaintiff asserts that the district court misapplied Sections 37-1-8 and 37-1-10. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2}…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Cooper v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Morgan Keegan Mortgage Co. v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Matter of Estate of HeeterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Christus St. Vincent Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Duarte-AfarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Albuquerque v. Pangaea Cinema LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Figueroa v. Thi of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Figueroa v. THI of New MexicoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.