Legal Opinion
United States v. Murray F. Hardesty
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1997No. 95-3392PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
The only issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in increasing the defendant’s base offense level by 2 levels based on United States Sentencing Guideline § 3A1.1 (1994). 1 Our study of the matter convinces us that the district court did not err in increasing the defendant’s base offense level by 2 levels, and we affirm.
As will be developed, the defendant, pursuant to a plea bargain, pled guilty to 3 counts of an 11 count criminal indictment. Based on the pre-sentence report, and the proffers of proof made at the time of sentencing, it appears…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Dennis Leo LowderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Gregory W. Frazier, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. David D. BrunsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Earl K. ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Gregory Checora, Warrenell Cuch, Bobby Redcap, and Reuben Cuch, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Evan Ray TissnolthtosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.