Legal Opinion

Brown v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 9, 1948No. 16010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is no merit in the contention that the deed from L. V. Brown as guardian of Claudius Loam Brown, an imbecile minor son, is void because he was not legally appointed. The relation of guardian and ward exists by operation of law between a father, if alive, and his minor child. Code, § 49-102. And the fact that the minor may be an imbecile presents no exception to this rule. Since the relation of guardian and ward is created by operation of law between a father and his minor child, upon the ordinary’s approval of a bond filed by such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Neal v. BoykinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Copelan v. KimbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Fussell v. DennardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Medlin & Sundy v. Downing Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. City of Griffin v. McKneelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Strickland v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API