Legal Opinion

Johnson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1897No. Nos. 10,268—(215)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Otis, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff was riding in a funeral procession in a carriage driven by, and in the control of, her daughter-in-law. The funeral procession started on Eighth street, west of Broadway, in the city of St. Paul, and proceeded east on Eighth street to the intersection of that street with Broadway, where it crossed the railway tracks of the defendant, and then proceeded up the east side of Broadway. The carriage in which plaintiff was riding was near the rear of the procession, and while it was crossing the railway tracks it was struck…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howe v. Minneapolis, Saint Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Maloney v. Winston Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ploetz v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Koplitz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API