Legal Opinion
Givens v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 22, 2016No. 88/15Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dominic Givens v. State of Maryland, No. 88, September Term, 2015 ALLEGEDLY INCONSISTENT VERDICTS – PRESERVATION – WAIVER – To preserve for review any issue as to allegedly inconsistent verdicts, defendant in criminal trial by jury must object to allegedly inconsistent verdicts before verdicts become final and trial court discharges jury; defendant waives issue as to allegedly inconsistent verdicts by failing to object before verdicts are final and trial court discharges jury. Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No. CT120050C Argued: May 5, 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.