Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Fusco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant Koehring Company appeals from an order which denied its motion to preclude "at this time”. Defendant claims that the bill of particulars is deficient in specifying which injuries are claimed to be permanent and in stating the defect or defects claimed in the air compressor which exploded and injured plaintiff. Plaintiff’s bill of particulars restated all the personal injuries and alleged that "On information and belief, some and/or all of the foregoing injuries are believed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caivana v. SpohnNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Eisenstaedt v. SchweitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Marshall v. Zimmerly's ExpressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Hanson Place Methodist Episcopal Church v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API