Legal Opinion
Adams v. Deloreto
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in assessing costs of $1,000 upon plaintiff (see, CPLR 3126; Flynn v Debonis, 246 AD2d 852, 853; Wolford v Cerrone, 184 AD2d 833, 834; Renford v Lizardo, 104 AD2d 717, 718). Under the circumstances of this case, however, it was an abuse of discretion to require plaintiff “personally” to pay such costs as a condition of her being permitted to attend a further independent medical examination. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henderson v. StilwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Miller v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Kimmel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Wolford v. CerroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Renford v. LizardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Optic Plus Enterprises, Ltd. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Hilley v. SanabriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Fox v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Burke v. Arcadis G&M of New York Architectural & Engineering Services, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017