Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Commercial Warehouse, Div. of Thompson Automotive Warehouse, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 27, 1989No. 88-3545PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The six appellants are jobber-wholesalers of automotive parts in the Tampa, Florida area. Appellees are seven nationwide manufacturers and five regional warehouse distributors (WDs) of automotive parts. In the typical line of distribution, manufacturers sell parts to WDs which in turn resell them to jobbers. Jobbers then resell parts to retailers, including automotive garages and retail parts stores.
*87In their complaint, the jobbers claimed that the manufacturers and the WDs respectively violated § 2(a) and § 2(f) of the Robinson-Patman Act.1 After discovery, both parties moved for summary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hiram Walker, Incorporated, and South Florida Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. A & S Tropical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Barnosky Oils, Inc. v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- American News Company and the Union News Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Purolator Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Purolator Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeLong Equipment Co. v. Washington Mills Electro Minerals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Delong Equipment Company v. Washington Mills Electro Minerals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Contractor Tool Supply, Inc. v. JPW Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Don Pierce v. Commercial WarehouseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989