Legal Opinion
Prasoprat v. Benov
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 25, 2003No. CV028751HLHJWJPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HUPP, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected.
IT IS ORDERED that a Judgment be entered denying the instant Petition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Fernandez v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- William Joseph Quinn v. Glen Robinson, United States Marshal for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Elijah Ephraim Jhirad v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal, Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Lui Kin-Hong, A/K/A Jerry LuiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Suwit Prasoprat v. Michael Benov, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Prasoprat v. BenovDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- United States v. Nunez-GarridoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Prasoprat v. BenovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005