Neagle v. Herbert
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, on the common counts. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an action of assumpsit by defendant in error against plaintiff in error for work done and material furnished in pursuance of a contract between the parties, and for extra work. Defendant in error recovered judgment for the sum of $2,745.26, to reverse which the present suit was brought. The declaration contains only the common counts. John F. Neagle, plaintiff in error, pleaded the general issue.
Under date of May 9, 1892, M. E. Herbert, the defendant in error, entered into a written contract with the firm of F. C. Neagle &…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adlard v. MuldoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Fowler v. DeakmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Stebbins v. NilesMississippi Supreme Court · 1852
- Lane v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Claire v. ClaireNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Piper v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- King v. KahnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Anderson-Ross Floors, Inc. v. Scherrer Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Congress Construction Co. v. Interior Building Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899
- Foster v. McKeownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.