Legal Opinion
Accilien v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 29, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
STERN, P.J.A.D.
Plaintiff, Willio Aecilien, appeals from the denial of his motion for “leave to restore this matter to the trial calendar and to file a rejection of arbitration award and for a trial de novo, out-of-time.”1 It is uncontested that the arbitration was conducted under R. 4:21A and that the complaint was dismissed on April 1, 1998, after no action was taken by any party for more than fifty days following the arbitrator’s determination. On January 27, 1998, the arbitrator found no liability and made no award to plaintiff as “plaintiff has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Hartsfield v. FantiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Wallace v. JFK Hartwyck at Oak Tree, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- POLICEMAN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 292 v. Bor. of N. HaledonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Watts v. CamaliganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Allen v. Heritage Court AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999