Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jackson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2007No. 15S01-0609-CR-333Published

1DissentRucker, J.

Because the defendant in this case did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel, I respectfully dissent.

It is well-settled that the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of our federal Constitution provide criminal defendants in state courts the fundamental right to be represented by counsel at trial. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 342-43, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). This right is not absolute; it may be waived by the defendant. Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 465, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). Waiver may be communicated verbally or through the defendant’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API