Legal Opinion

Lipschitz v. Sindell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 18, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Memorandum The agreed statement of facts shows that all the owners in common have united in this proceeding and that the possession sought is for one of them. Each tenant in common is entitled as against third parties to possession of the premises. It cannot be assumed that Congress, by an act which states a purpose to remove Federal restrictions, intended to give owners in common less rights to possession than a rent director could give under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 by a certificate such as was heretofore issued prior to July 1, 1947, authorizing the removal of these tenants…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lehr v. FeigenbaumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API