Lipschitz v. Sindell
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Memorandum The agreed statement of facts shows that all the owners in common have united in this proceeding and that the possession sought is for one of them. Each tenant in common is entitled as against third parties to possession of the premises. It cannot be assumed that Congress, by an act which states a purpose to remove Federal restrictions, intended to give owners in common less rights to possession than a rent director could give under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 by a certificate such as was heretofore issued prior to July 1, 1947, authorizing the removal of these tenants…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Lehr v. FeigenbaumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1948