Legal Opinion

Boe v. Healy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1969No. File 10460Published

1Opinion of the Court

168 N.W.2d 710 (1969)

Nancy BOE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

James HEALY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 10460.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

June 12, 1969.

Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, Lyle J. Wirt, Sioux Falls, for defendant and appellant.

Robert Patterson, Jr., William L. Dickey, Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and respondent.

HOMEYER, Judge.

Plaintiff, Nancy Boe, was a tenant in a duplex owned by the defendant, James Healy, and in this action seeks to recover from him damages for the loss of her personal property as the result of a fire. A jury found in her favor. Defendant's motions for directed…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Morris v. King Cole Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Stupka v. ScheidelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Van Every v. OggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Sieber v. BlancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API