Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Rutledge

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 19, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, C. J.

Original proceeding in prohibition. Relators, lawyers of the city of St. Louis, seek to prohibit the circuit court of said city, Division No. 4, from proceeding further with a contempt case pending in said court.

In due course, a motion for a new trial was filed by relators in a certain cause then pending in said circuit court. Thereafter, said court, of its own motion, entered a citation of record, which was served on relators. The citation charged that said motion for a new trial contained excessive and contemptuous language concerning the conduct of the judge of said court during the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hofmann v. ScarrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. CockrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jarboe v. HoltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Wendt v. JourneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Holt v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Burrell-El v. AutreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Madden v. PadbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API