Stephens v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted arid convicted of the
theft of a horse, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary.
The appellant complains that. the court erred in overruling his second application for a continuance. As qualified by the court the bill presents no error, the court stating, “the subpoenas referred to in the motion had been returned considerable time before the trial, the return showing the witnesses had not been found, and no further process issued nor asked for up to the time of the trial.” In addition to this the application itself…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cabral v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Dillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Hinsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Boaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Ansley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Pass v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.