Legal Opinion

Hudspeth v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided January 19, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle B. Roberts, Judge.

The taxpayers appealed from the Department of Revenue’s Order No. I-70-8, assessing additional personal income taxes for the years 1965 and 1966 for income received during the period March 1965 to June 1966, while the taxpayers were physically absent from the state, on the ground that they continued to be legally domiciled in Oregon throughout the period.

The facts are not contested. Ronald J. Hudspeth was brought to Prineville, Oregon, by his parents in 1936 when he was three years old. He is now married and has children. The operations of his father and of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. ZimmermanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pickering v. WinchOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Elwert v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Godfrey v. GodfreyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re Noyes' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bleasdell v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2004
  2. Ott v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2002
  3. Backman v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1999
  4. Dane v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100440d (or.tax 2-2-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  5. Gorski v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 091291b (or.tax 11-24-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API