Legal Opinion

Meza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 1989No. 88-3175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s convictions of armed kidnapping, armed sexual battery, armed burglary of a dwelling and burglary of a conveyance. We also affirm the sentence imposed for Count IV, armed burglary of a dwelling. The state concedes error in sentencing on Counts I, II, III and V. We agree and reverse for resentencing on these counts.

We also strike the imposition of costs and attorney’s fees for failure to give the appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984).

AFF…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Shipley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API