Legal Opinion

Hanson Production Co. v. Americas Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1997No. 96-20407PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this diversity case under Texas law is whether a surplus lines insurer, in order to avoid its coverage obligations, must show prejudice where the insured has failed to provide prompt notice of a claim. Because we conclude that the Supreme Court of Texas would require proof of prejudice, we reverse.

BACKGROUND

In 1985 appellant Hanson Minerals Company, a Texas corporation, entered into operating agreements pertaining to a Texas oil and gas prospect. In 1989 and 1990, per its agreement with the non-operators, Hanson procured two comprehensive general liability…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  4. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Gemmy Industries Corp. v. Alliance General InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  4. Hanson Production Company v. Americas Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Motiva Enterprises v. St Paul Fire & MarinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API