Hanson Production Co. v. Americas Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this diversity case under Texas law is whether a surplus lines insurer, in order to avoid its coverage obligations, must show prejudice where the insured has failed to provide prompt notice of a claim. Because we conclude that the Supreme Court of Texas would require proof of prejudice, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
In 1985 appellant Hanson Minerals Company, a Texas corporation, entered into operating agreements pertaining to a Texas oil and gas prospect. In 1989 and 1990, per its agreement with the non-operators, Hanson procured two comprehensive general liability…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Hernandez v. Gulf Group LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Gemmy Industries Corp. v. Alliance General InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Hanson Production Company v. Americas Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Motiva Enterprises v. St Paul Fire & MarinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006