Legal Opinion

Pickering, Etc. v. Hartsock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a garnishment proceeding growing out of a judgment, against the defendant Hartsock, a physician of Albany, Missouri, who was sued by plaintiff for malpractice. The judgment was in the sum of $5000 and defendant appealed. He was given ten days after the term in which the judgment was rendered to file an appeal bond but the appeal was never perfected. He carried a liability policy with the garnishee who employed a local attorney to defend the suit and perfect the appeal. After the ten days for filing the appeal bond had elapsed, plaintiff’s attorney inquired of the local attorney on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rieger v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Anderson v. Metropolitan Stock ExchangeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Bain v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Century Realty Co. v. Frankfort Marine Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Harms v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Johnston v. SweanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. American Surety Co. of New York v. FranciscusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Graff v. Continental Auto Insurance UnderwritersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API