Legal Opinion

United States v. Wright

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 26, 2001No. 00-40024-02-SAC, 00-40024-03-SAC, 00-40024-06-SAC, 00-40024-10-SACPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Senior Judge.

The case comes before the court on the defendant Rhonda Hibbard’s Motion to Suppress Wiretap Interceptions (Dk. 551); the defendant Michael Hopkins’ Motion to Suppress Wiretap Evidence (Dk. 583); and the defendant Timothy Cline’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Derived from Interception of Wire Communications (Dk. 618). The defendants Melissa Bunce, Janet Cline, John Cervine, Ginger Breuil, and Johnny Shane Wright have filed respective motions to join these motions to suppress. (Dks. 643, 698, 708, 716 and 719). The court grants these motions to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Thomas Fury and John QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API