Legal Opinion

McDonald v. McDonald

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 27, 1981No. 21526PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Paul Max McDonald appeals from an order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

Respondent Carolyn Sayers McDonald petitioned the family court for separate maintenance and support. She alleged ownership of the marital residence and asked the court to order appellant to vacate the premises. Appellant answered claiming an equitable interest in the residence. Respondent replied denying appellant had any such interest. The family court, after a pendente lite hearing, ordered appellant to vacate the house pending a final determination on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser v. PyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API