Legal Opinion

Stein Hall & Co. v. Sealand Dock & Terminal Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis L. Valente, J.

The plaintiff, an importer of tapioca flour and seed, instituted this action to recover a money judgment from the defendants herein named. The claim in part arises out of the nondelivery of a portion o’f a cargo of tapioca imported from Brazil for the account of the plaintiff and in part for the loss of a number of bags of flour and seed stored for the plaintiff’s account with the Sealand Storage and Warehouse Corporation.

The case was tried before me without a jury and findings of fact and conclusions of law have been waived.

The defendants, Sealand Dock and Terminal Corporation and Sealand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Buffalo Grain Co. v. . SowerbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Rosenstein v. . VogemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Drisko v. Barber S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HerceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API