Legal Opinion

People v. Matta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress his statement to the police at the time of his warrantless arrest. Although warrantless, this arrest was justified because of exigent circumstances (Steagald v United States, 451 US 204, 221; McDonald v United States, 335 US 451, 456; People v Burr, 124 AD2d 5, affd 70 NY2d 354, cert denied — US —, 108 S Ct 1294). The police actions were in response to the murder of Julio Bentances. At the scene of the *1015murder, the police determined that an assailant had shot the victim in the head…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. RoopchandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. MealerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MohammedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. PanepintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API