Legal Opinion

Hull v. Donze

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 11, 1927No. 28448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to confirm a default and dismissing plaintiff’s suit.

Plaintiff sued defendant, her husband, for a divorce on the ground that defendant had been “found guilty of the crime of having stolen property in his possession [knowing it to be stolen] * * *, and sentenced to serve nine months imprisonment [in the parish prison; i. e., county jail].”

I

The penalty fixed for the above-named offense is “imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not exceeding two years.” Act 72 of 1898, p. 95 (amending Rev. Stat. of 1870, § 832).

Imprisonment “at hard labor” means…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Ex parte McCluskyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas · 1889
  4. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. State v. HylandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Burleigh v. SavoieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API