Legal Opinion

Lanham v. Tri-State Sand & Gravel, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2000No. 33,180-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

|, CARAWAY, J.

In this case, plaintiffs/legatees claim a two-thirds interest in immovable property which was the subject of a court-authorized exchange during the administration of a succession. The succession is now closed, and the defendant is a third-party purchaser of the property. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs’ action for the nullity of the transfer of the succession property on the exceptions of res judicata and no right of action'. We now reverse these rulings and remand the case for the proper joinder of all heirs or legatees of the closed succession under La. C.C.P. art. 641,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fried v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Key v. SalleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Sun Oil Company v. RogerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. Bordelon v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Succession of VillarrubiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilcher v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Moore v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API