Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 7, 1961No. 38884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

While Code § 114-106 sets forth the premise that settlements are encouraged under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, it goes on to provide that a copy of a settlement agreement shall be filed by the employer with the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, and “no such settlement shall be binding until approved by the Board.” In the case of Wiley v. Bituminous Cas. Co., 76 Ga. App. 862, 863 (3) (47 SE2d 652), this court stated that a settlement agreement, not otherwise identified, filed with and approved by the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation was res judicata under this section,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wiley v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HOUSTON FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Wills v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Garrett v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. United States Casualty Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Williamson v. Gulf InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API