Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Folsom

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Debt by Folsom against Hooker and others, on a writing obligatory for the payment of 100 dollars. Plea, failure of consideration.

The plea alleges that the writing obligatory sued on, was given in part payment, viz., for the one-third of the purchase-money of a certain tract of land purchased by said Hooker of one Lewis L. Davis, who directed the writing obligatory to be made to the plaintiff below; that Davis conveyed the land to Hooker by deed in fee, with covenants of warranty and seizin; that the only title Davis had to the land was obtained by him at sheriff’s sale upon two executions…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whisler v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Axtel v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Brewster v. HinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Marvin v. ApplegateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Haycraft v. GrigsbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Pence v. RhonemusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API