Legal Opinion

Oregon v. Nicholson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 14, 1974No. C 73-12-3820 CrPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction of manslaughter. ORS 163.125. In his only assignment of error defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to suppress certain incriminating statements made by defendant during a custodial interrogation.

The central issue presented for our review is whether defendant made a request for the presence of counsel at the conclusion of his Miranda① warnings.

The statements in issue were made to Detectives Tercek and Blodgett of the Portland police department on December 13, 1973, in the course of an investigation into the strangulation death of Edward…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. SuggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Hewitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. DykeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Oregon v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API