Legal Opinion

Palermo at Lakeland, LLC v. City of Bonney Lake

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 3, 2008No. 36385-2-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

¶1 The city of Bonney Lake (City) appeals the Pierce County Superior Court’s decision that its system development charge (SDC) was unreasonable. We hold that the City arbitrarily adopted ordinance 1192 under which it assessed Palermo for connecting to the City’s water system; thus, the ordinance was void, leaving the prior *69ordinance in effect. But the trial court erred when it applied a remedy that calculated the proper charge based on the City’s expert, who justified the City’s ordinance retroactively, and awarded attorney fees under the common fund doctrine. We remand, holding that the City…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ZornesWashington Supreme Court · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TJ Landco, LLC v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. City Of Issaquah, V. Westridge-issaquah Ii LpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  3. TJ Landco, LLC v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. TJ Landco, llc v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API