Legal Opinion
Herman Quarles v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1974No. 73-1825PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
This class action was filed by 42 separate plaintiffs against 13 separate defendants. Seven plaintiffs’ claims have been dismissed upon their own motion, and this action was dismissed against ten defendants on plaintiffs’ own motion. Fuqua Industries, Inc., Career Enterprises, Inc., and L. E. Timberlake 1 remain as defendants.
Appellants seek compensatory and punitive damages, for themselves and for all members of the class so damaged in the State of Kansas, amounting to $40,000,000 plus costs. Appellants claim the defendants placed misleading advertising on radio and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Steinway v. Majestic Amusement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Curtis Publishing Company, a Corporation v. Louis CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- D'Jamoos, Estate of Weingeroff v. Pilatus AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Benton v. Cameco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- ARW Exploration Corp. v. AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.