Legal Opinion
H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1986No. Civ. 4-86-546PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Northwestern Bell Telephone Company's motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment, and on plaintiffs’ motion to strike defenses. Plaintiffs’ motion will be denied. Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff H.J., Inc. is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Burnsville, Minnesota. Plaintiffs Kirk Dahl, Mary Krugen, Larry Krugen, Susan Davis, Robert Neal, Isaac H. Ward, Richard L. Anderson, and Thomas J. Mott are each Minnesota residents. Each of the named plaintiffs has…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.