Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brabham v. Mississippi ex rel. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1938No. 8671Published

1DissentHolmes, Circuit Judge

In the light of Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. -, and Ruhlin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 58 S.Ct. 860, 82 L.Ed. -, I think the petition for a rehearing should be granted.

See, Robinson & Patterson v. Goings, 63 Miss. 500; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Lawrence, 74 Miss. 782, 22 So. 53; Yazoo & M. V. R. Co. v. Williams, 87 Miss. 344, 39 So. 489; Case v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., 114 Miss. 21, 74 So. 773; Trico Coffee Co. v. Clemens, 168 Miss. 748, 151 So. 175; Beard v. Williams, 172 Miss. 880, 161 So. 750; Teche Lines, Inc., v. Pope, 175 Miss. 393, 166 So. 539; Rogers v. Lewis,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LawrenceMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Teche Lines, Inc. v. PopeMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API