Legal Opinion

Krenski v. Aubuchon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1993No. 63772PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Plaintiff Amy Krenski appeals denial of her post-trial “motion for summary judgment on appeal bond.” We find we do not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal is sustained.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict for her personal injuries against defendant following an automobile collision. A jury awarded plaintiff $101,250 on June 27, 1991. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict in the amount of $108,266.63, including prejudgment interest. Defendant appealed. On October 6, 1992, this court affirmed the trial court’s judgment. Krenski v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krenski v. AubuchonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Cain v. Buehner and BuehnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Cape Retirement Community, Inc. v. KuehleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Empiregas, Inc. of Palmyra v. ZinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Annapolis, N.A. v. Jefferson Insurance Co. of New YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Krenski v. Continental Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API