Glatt v. Fortman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jennings Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant’s complaint is founded on á promissory note executed by the appellees. The note contains a provision making it payable at the Jennings County Bank. The answer alleges that on the day the note became due the appellees paid to the bank the principal and interest of the note, and directed that it be applied to its payment; that, at the time the money was placed in the bank the appellees did not know who the holders of the note were, and that long after the money was deposited the bank became insolvent.
The answer must be adjudged bad. We have a statute which reads thus: “In any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Brabston v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- King v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Palmer v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Bartel v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Cummings v. HurdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Richmond v. Hog Creek Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Bank of Montreal v. IngersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.