Legal Opinion

United States v. North Landing Line Construction Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 20, 1998No. Civ. 2:96CV1073PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER and OPINION

MORGAN, District Judge.

In this CERCLA 1 case, the United States sought to recover from defendant North Landing Line Construction Company (“North Landing”) response costs incurred by the United States in response to the release or threatened release of hazardous waste at the Sutton Enterprise Superfund Site (“the Sutton Site”) in Chesapeake, Virginia. At the conclusion of the liability portion of a bench trial on February 19, 1998, the Court GRANTED the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict as to liability. This opin ion sets forth in more detail the reasoning behind the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
  2. United States v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  3. United States v. a & F Materials Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984
  4. United States v. Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. South Florida Water Management District v. MontalvoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R.R. Street & Co. v. Pilgrim Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. United States v. Union Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API