Legal Opinion
Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. Machlett & Son
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 12, 1929No. 2465PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion for an injunction under a supplemental bill.
Patent No. 1,125,476 was held valid and infringed as to claim 1 by the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit, on the original appeal. 27 F.(2d) 702.
On a motion for a supplementary injunction after decree on mandate, on a button caesium electrode tube made by Rainbow Light, Inc., one of the defendants in the original suit, I made and filed an opinion on March 12, 1929 [(D. C.) 31 F.(2d) 989] in which I erroneously construed the opinion of the Court of Appeals of this circuit, on the original appeal.
A…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Electrical Products Corp. v. Neale, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1931