Legal Opinion

Cpuc v. Ferc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 8, 2018No. 16-70481Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES No. 16-70481 COMMISSION, Petitioner, OPINION CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES STATE WATER PROJECT; SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT; TRANSMISSION AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, Petitioners-Intervenors, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent, PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent-Intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Argued and Submitted October 13, 2017 San Francisco, California Filed January 8, 2018 2 CPUC V. FERC…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API