Legal Opinion

Smith v. Moulton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This is an appeal taken by the plaintiff from the order of the District Court for Dodge County, affirming the decision and report of the commissioners appointed to audit claims against the estate of Rice II. Moulton, deceased, disallowing certain claims presented by him against said estate. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Oowrt.

Wilson, Cii. I.

The respondent’s intestate, and the appellant, in the year 1853, entered into a co-partnership for the purpose of carrying on the mercantile business at Monroe, in the State of Wisconsin, under the firm name of R. H. Moulton & Co.

*353Said, partnership was dissolved in August, 1855, — the appellant purchasing the interest of his co-partner in the property of the firm. At the time of said purchase, the .parties after specifying the goods and effects purchased and the liabilities assumed by Smith, entered into an agreement in writing in and by which they assumed a joint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Zinn v. StammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Cotulla v. UrbahnTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hilo Products, Inc. v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API