Legal Opinion

In re Clark

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 27, 1938No. 3978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaNd, Judge

A number of claims in appellant’s application for a patent relating to an improvement in slack adjusters for use with airbrake equipment on railroad cars, etc., including claim 1, the only allowed claim *1318printed in tbe back of tbe record, having been allowed, appellant has appealed here from tbe decision of tbe Board of Appeals affirming that of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 12 and 19. Said rejected claims, and allowed claim 1, follow:

12. In an air brake equipment, tbe combination with a push rod and a live cylinder lever operatively connected therewith, an operating mechanism,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tafas v. DollCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Application of FranzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Mojonnier Dawson Co. v. U. S. Dairies Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API