Legal Opinion

Shields v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 31, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01655Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CONROY SHIELDS, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-01655 (JAM) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS This case asks whether a federal court in a medical malpractice action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) should apply the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or should apply special state law pleading rules. Connecticut has a special pleading rule for medical malpractice actions. The Connecticut rule requires a plaintiff to file not just an ordinary complaint that states a claim for malpractice but also to attach…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API