Legal Opinion

Morris v. Parks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining a demurer to the complaint. It is alleged in plaintiff’s complaint that on February 1, 1932, plaintiff was employed by the supervisors of the Lane County Dog Control District, as enforcing officer for the balance of the calendar year of 1932, at an agreed salary of $156 per month, plus five cents per mile for all mileage traveled by plaintiff in the exercise of his duties as enforcement officer for Lane County Dog Control District, in excess of 1,040 miles, and that on May 1,1932, the defendants without cause and in violation of said contract, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burnap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State Ex Rel. Stage v. MacKieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Gracey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Wright v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Murray v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Adie v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Begich v. JeffersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Duke v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API