Legal Opinion

Conard v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 9, 1890No. Congressional 17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On the defendants’ Motion. The Reporters’ statement of the case : The facts of this case and .the grounds of the motion will be found in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

These claims, called the “ Loudoun County Claims,” are referred to this court in accordance with the provisions of the act of March 3, 1883, called the “Bowman Act,” and it is objected that the court is without jurisdiction to find and report the facts therein.

November 27, 1864, Major-G-eneral Sheridan issued the following order:

“Headquarters Middle Military Division,
“November 27, 1864.
“ G-eneral : You are hereby directed to proceed, to-morrow morning at 7 o’clock, with two brigades of your division now in camp, to the east side of the Blue Ridge, via Ashby’s (lap, *434iind operate against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heflebower v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
  2. Dodd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
  3. Vance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1993
  2. Brandon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API