Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Webber
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1968No. 41127PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.
The appeal to the Common Pleas Court from the order of the township trustees was taken púr*180suant to Section 2506.01, Revised Code, which reads in part:
“Every final order, adjudication, or decision of any # * * tribunal, authority, board * * * or other division of any political subdivision of the state may be reviewed by the Common Pleas Court * * * as provided in Sections 2505.01 to 2505.45, inclusive, of the Revised Code [the Appellate Procedure Act], and as such procedure is modified by Sections 2506.01 to 2506.04, inclusive, of the Revised Code. * * *”
There is nothing in Sections 2506.01 to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bailes v. MartinoOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Jacobs v. MadduxOhio Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by12 opinions
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Gold Coast Realty, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- McCann v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re LockeOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- In Re NameyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.