Legal Opinion

Shull v. Gladden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1918No. 9913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before DeVorE, J., Richland, Spring term, 1917. Action by R. L- Shull .against W. C. Gladden, W.' M. Gladden, andj.-S. Shehan. ' From judgment for plaintiff, defendant, W. M. Gladden, appeals. Plaintiff alleged: That on the 25th day of.

Read the full summary

Before DeVorE, J., Richland, Spring term, 1917. Action by R. L- Shull .against W. C. Gladden, W.' M. Gladden, andj.-S. Shehan. ' From judgment for plaintiff, defendant, W. M. Gladden, appeals. Plaintiff alleged: That on the 25th day of. April, 1914, the codefendant herein, W. C. Gladden, made, executed, and delivered to thé plaintiff herein, R. Leon Shull, his certain promissory note in writing, dated that date, wherein and whereby he promised to pay to the plaintiff, R. Leon Shull, the'sum of $314.20, eight months after date, to wit, on the 1st day of December, 1914,-with interest thereon,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice ITydrick.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed on the authority of Norwood National Bank v. Piedmont Pub. Co., 106 S. C. 472, 91 S. E. 866.

Reversed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commercial Nat'l Bank v. Ashley Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. McCrae v. SpiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Rainwater v. CriderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API